critical thinking course
home about us contact



what is the critical thinking course
how do i register/buy?
why teach critical thinking course?
login
news
try it out now!
terms & conditions

teacher's area
Back to:

Chapter 1 Teacher's Guide:
Other:
Please find below the first page of Chapter 1 in the Teacher's Guide:
Back to Teacher's Guide Menu >>

RESOURCES:


Opening cartoons from the Students’ Guide for Unit 1.
Three large cards with the word REASON on one, CONCLUSION on the second and PERSUASION on the third.
Cards for the Introductory Ideas
Exercise 1.1 (available in the Teachers’ Area)
Exercise 1.2 (the exercise is available in the Students’ Area and the answers in the Teachers’ Area)
Summary sheet (available in the Students’ Area.)

LESSON PROCEDURE:

Display the cartoons.
Identify which is the ARGUMENT and which is the DISAGREEMENT.
Discuss why the first cartoon is a disagreement i.e. the idea that it is merely two opposing statements with no justification for the positions being taken.
Ask the students to give you further examples of disagreements.
Discuss why the second cartoon is an argument i.e. the idea that there are three parts to Fred’s response:-
There is a REASON-“the notes on the internet are better than mine.”
There is a CONCLUSION-“so you should revise from them.”
There is an attempt to persuade-this is contained in the phrase “you should”
Display the three cards with the words REASON, CONCLUSION and PERSUASION (you can print them here >>) where they can be clearly seen throughout the lesson.
Check that in Critical Thinking the students understand that AN ARGUMENT IS AN APPEAL TO REASON i.e. it is an attempt to make somebody accept the truth about what is being said and in order to achieve this it must have the three parts.
The students should complete the Summary Sheet for Unit 1, Part 1.
Complete Exercise 1.1. from the Teacher’s Guide.
(i) Display the example cards (cards can be printed from the next page).
Discuss why they are a disagreement and not an argument. (They are two opposing positions but there are no reasons given. There are inferred conclusions “should go/shouldn’t go” and the word “should” has a persuasive element but the absence of reasons means that anyone listening cannot be expected to accept the truth of either position.)
Discuss what is needed to turn them into arguments i.e. reasons must be given and the sentence reconstructed to link the reasons to the conclusion. Words which attempt to persuade the listener must be included also.
Ask the students to suggest reasons which could be integrated into the phrases to turn them into arguments.
Display the suggested arguments, identifying the following:-
(a) REASON:-“It is fun to go on the rides on the Pleasure Beach at Blackpool and as it is my birthday next week we should do something enjoyable.”
CONCLUSION:-“so I think we should go to Blackpool.”
PERSUASION:-use of the word “should”
N.B. Some students may claim, correctly, that the reason is also an argument as it contains a conclusion “do something enjoyable” with the word “should” as a persuasive element. This is known as an Intermediate Conclusion and is an idea which will be developed further in the course.
(b) REASON:-“I don’t like rides as they make me sick.”
CONCLUSION:-“I don’t think so”-implied “I do not think we should go to Blackpool.”
PERSUASION:- Implication of the word “should” in the conclusion.
(ii) Distribute statements 1 to 10. Each of the statements (a) and (b) should be given to a pair of students. The statements are disagreements. In pairs the students should rewrite them to turn them into an argument. The pairs should read out their arguments with the class identifying the reasons, conclusions and the persuasive element.
The students should complete Exercise 1.2 which is located in the Student’s Area. (This could be used as an assessment exercise.)
The answers are in the Teacher’s Area.